Apple White iPhone 4
Since getting confirmation last week from Apple that the white iPhone 4 is absolutely, positively going to launch in the very near future, we've been flooded with rumors about just when the smartphone will finally be available. We've seen it in Verizon's computers, and heard from Europe that the phone might be showing up on April 26. Now there's one more date to throw in the running, with a report out of England saying the iOS device may arrive this week, on April 20.
ThreeUK is offering the white iPhone 4 on pre-order, advising interested customers that the earliest they should expect the device to ship would be this Wednesday, the 20th. There is some concern that this information may be a typo; after all, Apple only confirmed the phone a few days ago, with nothing more committal than saying it would be out this spring. You'd think that if the company bothered to make a statement regarding the phone's release just a week before its launch, it would have something a little more concrete to reveal regarding the phone's availability.
It's probably not a smart move betting on this rumor, but it's one more possibility of which you should at least be aware.
from - http://pocketnow.com
business
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Monday, April 25, 2011
Japanese Table Manners
Japanese Table Manners
When drinking alcoholic beverages, it is a Japanese custom to serve each other, rather than pouring the beverage into one’s own glass. You are supposed to periodically check your friends’ cups, and serve them more once their cups are getting empty. Likewise, if someone wants to serve you more alcohol, you should quickly empty your glass and hold it towards that person.
While it is considered bad manner to become obviously drunk in some formal restaurants, for example in restaurants that serve kaiseki ryori (Japanese haute cuisine), the same is not true for other types of restaurants such as izakaya, as long as you do not bother other guests.
Do not start drinking until everybody at the table is served and the glasses are raised for a drinking salute, which usually is “kampai”. Avoid using “chin chin” when drinking a toast, since in Japanese this expression refers to the male genitals.
Individual vs. Shared DishesIt is common to have several dishes being served that is to be shared. Unlike western culture where food is served individually, in Japan, dishes are shared because it’s part of their food culture. If you are being served shared dishes, you are supposed to move some food from the shared plates onto your own plate by yourself, using the opposite end of your chopsticks (if you have used them already) or with special chopsticks that may be provided for that purpose.
from - http://everyday.3yen.com/2007-02-01/japanese-table-manners/
When drinking alcoholic beverages, it is a Japanese custom to serve each other, rather than pouring the beverage into one’s own glass. You are supposed to periodically check your friends’ cups, and serve them more once their cups are getting empty. Likewise, if someone wants to serve you more alcohol, you should quickly empty your glass and hold it towards that person.
While it is considered bad manner to become obviously drunk in some formal restaurants, for example in restaurants that serve kaiseki ryori (Japanese haute cuisine), the same is not true for other types of restaurants such as izakaya, as long as you do not bother other guests.
Do not start drinking until everybody at the table is served and the glasses are raised for a drinking salute, which usually is “kampai”. Avoid using “chin chin” when drinking a toast, since in Japanese this expression refers to the male genitals.
Individual vs. Shared DishesIt is common to have several dishes being served that is to be shared. Unlike western culture where food is served individually, in Japan, dishes are shared because it’s part of their food culture. If you are being served shared dishes, you are supposed to move some food from the shared plates onto your own plate by yourself, using the opposite end of your chopsticks (if you have used them already) or with special chopsticks that may be provided for that purpose.
from - http://everyday.3yen.com/2007-02-01/japanese-table-manners/
Thursday, April 21, 2011
The Best CPUs
The Best CPU For Your Money?
By that, I mean the CPUs that offer the best performance at a given price.Why would you want that?
Because You Want:
- The best bang for the buck
- The best CPU for your money
- The highest performance possible!
So if you don’t have the time to do the research, or just don’t care to do it, don’t worry. I’ll come to your help with this guide of the best CPUs for your money.
Keep in mind:
I’ll use this opportunity to remind you that this article is only a guideline for the prices I’ve seen on April 21st. You’re letting yourself down if you’re not looking for deals when you decide to purchase.- Prices and availability change everyday. I can’t keep up with accurate pricing everyday, but I can suggest to you great CPUs that you won’t regret buying at the price ranges that I list. If you find what you think is a good deal on a CPU, make sure to compare the CPU against other before making your decision. AnandTech offers this great tool to compare various CPUs in various tests.
- This list is based on the best U.S. prices from NewEgg or Amazon. In other countries or in a retail stores, things might be different. All prices are based on new CPU prices, no used or open box CPU are listed; they might be a good deal, but they come with trade offs, such as limited return policy, limited warranty, etc.Make sure to double-check the CPU socket and other factors that affect compatibility.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
what do you think of gay
what do you think of gay
-I believe that there is a time and a place for everything and irrespective of sexual orientation, sexual activity in a public house is not one of them.
Edit.
I am not sure about that but I would think that if it was 'heavy' the answer would be yes.
People need to bear in mind that it is not so long ago that any homosexual behaviour in public was a criminal offence and punishable by a prison sentence, in fact I believe that overt sexual contact even between heterosexual couples in public is still considered 'lewd behaviour' by the police and punishable under the law
- Childish and self destructive actually, most people don't mind a peck but couples of any orientation snogging in public are enough to make most people squirm, by rubbing peoples noses in it this way they lose any sympathy from the public at large for the seemingly heavy handed way the publician dealt with the matter although from his point of view such behaviour at the time could well have sparked some disorder from any homophobic trogladites who may have been sitting in the pub at the time and the safety of
other customers has to be a factor.
A quiet word in their shell likes may well have sufficed.
- I think it was a massive over-reaction on the part of the pub staff to a couple kissing - a quiet word would have probably done the job.
And I think it's a massive over-reaction on the part of the gay campaigners which resulted in the John Snow pub closing early.
Perhaps if people actually talked to one another, instead of throwing people out of pubs, and organising mass kiss-ins .....
EDIT: Can 'Old Master' (aka Yerbury) really provide evidence for how 95% of the population thinks and feels? No, of course he can't!
Mr Yerbury - Nemesis, me? Surely not. But I will question unsubstantiated statistics like "95% of the population are repulsed by their behaviour". At least you understand that if you make the assertion it's your place to provide the evidence, not mine to provide proof which refutes it.
Some people are too stupid to understand that. Now, why on Earth would Redmonk feel the need to respond to the last statement? And what was he on about?
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110416023032AAUItQB
-I believe that there is a time and a place for everything and irrespective of sexual orientation, sexual activity in a public house is not one of them.
Edit.
I am not sure about that but I would think that if it was 'heavy' the answer would be yes.
People need to bear in mind that it is not so long ago that any homosexual behaviour in public was a criminal offence and punishable by a prison sentence, in fact I believe that overt sexual contact even between heterosexual couples in public is still considered 'lewd behaviour' by the police and punishable under the law
- Childish and self destructive actually, most people don't mind a peck but couples of any orientation snogging in public are enough to make most people squirm, by rubbing peoples noses in it this way they lose any sympathy from the public at large for the seemingly heavy handed way the publician dealt with the matter although from his point of view such behaviour at the time could well have sparked some disorder from any homophobic trogladites who may have been sitting in the pub at the time and the safety of
other customers has to be a factor.
A quiet word in their shell likes may well have sufficed.
- I think it was a massive over-reaction on the part of the pub staff to a couple kissing - a quiet word would have probably done the job.
And I think it's a massive over-reaction on the part of the gay campaigners which resulted in the John Snow pub closing early.
Perhaps if people actually talked to one another, instead of throwing people out of pubs, and organising mass kiss-ins .....
EDIT: Can 'Old Master' (aka Yerbury) really provide evidence for how 95% of the population thinks and feels? No, of course he can't!
Mr Yerbury - Nemesis, me? Surely not. But I will question unsubstantiated statistics like "95% of the population are repulsed by their behaviour". At least you understand that if you make the assertion it's your place to provide the evidence, not mine to provide proof which refutes it.
Some people are too stupid to understand that. Now, why on Earth would Redmonk feel the need to respond to the last statement? And what was he on about?
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110416023032AAUItQB
Sunday, April 17, 2011
how do you think with thai girl ?
how do you think with thai girl ?
- I believe that Thai guy can do that also, not just farang ...it's just happend to you by one farang, dont hate all farang in thailand, not fair for them. Also if some girls do that, and then it's make farang think that all thai girls are, it's not fair for all thai girls ... I dont know why Thailand have famous about this such thing ...You should mad on some thai girls who make farang think that all thai girls are same.
One of my friend who just been here first time asked me when we were at soi nana area" why alot of thai girls along with farang guy?" seems here sales girls ... OMG! I dont know what should I answer him, I cant deny that some girls do that.
One of my friend who just been here first time asked me when we were at soi nana area" why alot of thai girls along with farang guy?" seems here sales girls ... OMG! I dont know what should I answer him, I cant deny that some girls do that.
- Sure many Thai girls do that. But do not look down on them. Many have to do that to make money for there family. They have little education and not very good paying jobs and if they not do then there mother and father, brother and sisters not eat. Not everyone lucky like some of you girls who have good parents and have successful jobs. Many girls come to BKK only for that reason. To make money for there family
Monday, April 11, 2011
Real estate investment
Real estate investment involves the commitment of funds to property with an aim to generate income through rental or lease and to achieve capital appreciation. Real estate refers to immovable property, such as land, and everything else that is permanently attached to it, such as buildings. When a person acquires real estate, s/he also acquires a set of rights, including possession, control and transfer rights.
Understanding real estate investment is crucial because it usually involves a substantial investment and a long-term one. Moreover , the real estate market can be unpredictable. This is particularly important when one goes beyond buying a home to actually 'investing' in real estate. There are a number of ways in which an investor can participate in the real estate market.
One can opt for real estate investment with an aim to rent the property out to a tenant. The owner (landlord) earns a continuous stream of rent from the tenant, but is responsible for paying the mortgage, taxes and any costs associated with maintaining the property. The owner also benefits from capital appreciation (a rise in the value of the property over time). The landlord runs the risk of not finding a tenant and could suffer negative monthly cash flows, with mortgage payments and maintenance expenses still to be borne. As compared to owning stocks and bonds, rental real estate requires a significant amount time and effort to be devoted by the landlord.
Real estate investment groups are similar to small mutual funds. They are set up for rental properties. While an investor may own one or more units, a professionally managed company acquires, builds, maintains and lets out all the units on the properties in exchange for a percentage of the monthly rent.
Real Estate Trading
Real estate traders hold properties for only a short span of time (less than four months), aiming to sell them at a profit. This process is called flipping properties. Investors aim at purchasing significantly undervalued or very hot properties. Such owners may or may not invest money into improving the property before putting it back on sale. A bear market could result in substantial losses for a real estate trader, since the investment is large.
from - http://www.economywatch.com/investment/real-estate-investment.html
Understanding real estate investment is crucial because it usually involves a substantial investment and a long-term one. Moreover , the real estate market can be unpredictable. This is particularly important when one goes beyond buying a home to actually 'investing' in real estate. There are a number of ways in which an investor can participate in the real estate market.
One can opt for real estate investment with an aim to rent the property out to a tenant. The owner (landlord) earns a continuous stream of rent from the tenant, but is responsible for paying the mortgage, taxes and any costs associated with maintaining the property. The owner also benefits from capital appreciation (a rise in the value of the property over time). The landlord runs the risk of not finding a tenant and could suffer negative monthly cash flows, with mortgage payments and maintenance expenses still to be borne. As compared to owning stocks and bonds, rental real estate requires a significant amount time and effort to be devoted by the landlord.
Real estate investment groups are similar to small mutual funds. They are set up for rental properties. While an investor may own one or more units, a professionally managed company acquires, builds, maintains and lets out all the units on the properties in exchange for a percentage of the monthly rent.
Real Estate Trading
Real estate traders hold properties for only a short span of time (less than four months), aiming to sell them at a profit. This process is called flipping properties. Investors aim at purchasing significantly undervalued or very hot properties. Such owners may or may not invest money into improving the property before putting it back on sale. A bear market could result in substantial losses for a real estate trader, since the investment is large.
from - http://www.economywatch.com/investment/real-estate-investment.html
Friday, April 8, 2011
After Divorce, Stable Families Help Minimize Long-Term Harm To Children
After Divorce, Stable Families Help Minimize Long-Term Harm To Children
A new study found that children who lived in unstable family situations after their parents divorced fared much worse as adults on a variety of measures compared to children who had stable post-divorce family situations.
“For many children with divorced parents, particularly young ones, the divorce does not mark the end of family structure changes – it marks the beginning,” said Yongmin Sun, co-author of the study and associate professor of sociology at Ohio State University’s Mansfield campus.
“A stable family situation after divorce does not erase the negative effects of a divorce, but children in this situation fare much better than do those who experience chronic instability”
The study appears in a recent issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family. Sun conducted the study with Yuanzhang Li of the Allied Technology Group.
Data for this study came from the National Education Longitudinal Study, which surveyed thousands of students across the country beginning in 8th grade in 1988, when they were about 14 years old. They were surveyed again in 1990, 1992 and then again in 2000 when they were about 26 years old.
The study compared children who grew up in three different situations:
The researchers compared how children in these groups fared on measures of education, income and poverty in 2000 when they were 26.
Results showed that young adults who grew up in stable post-divorce families had similar chances of attending college and living in poverty compared to those from always married families. But they fared less well on measures of the highest degree obtained, occupational prestige and income.
However, the young adults who lived in unstable family situations after their parents divorced did worse on all measures. In fact, they fared more than twice as poorly on most measures compared to their peers who had stable family situations.
For example, adults from stable post-divorce families earned about $1,800 a year less than similar adults from always-married families. But those adults whose family situations changed one or more times between ages 14 and 18 earned about $4,600 less.
Sun noted that some of the children in the unstable family group also underwent a custody change between ages 14 and 18. An analysis showed that they did not fare significantly differently from those who were in unstable families, but did not experience a custody change.
There were also no significant differences between how boys and girls responded to family stability after a divorce, Sun said.
Why do children of divorce fare less well than those who grew up with parents who stayed married?
This study found that for those in stable post-divorce families, the difference in adult well-being was mostly due to a shortage of economic and social resources. Compared to always-married parents, divorced parents had a lower level of income, didn’t talk to their children as much about school-related matters, had fewer interactions with other parents, and moved their children to new schools more often.
“As many previous divorce studies point out, divorce reduces social resources within families because children have fewer interactions with the non-custodial parent, and in many cases, don’t get the quantity and quality of parenting from the custodial parent,” Sun said.
“In addition, after a family disruption, parents may not invest as much time with teachers and other parents in the community, all of which lead to a lower level of child well-being.”
For children in unstable families, the decline in social and economic resources was only part of the reason for the shortfalls they experienced in adulthood.
“These children probably experience a lot of stress and disruption from sources that we didn’t measure in this study,” he said.
These findings provide a clear message about how parents who are divorcing can best help their children, Sun said.
“A stabilized post-divorce family environment is clearly helpful for children, particularly for adolescents, such as those we studied, because stability allows children to focus on their own developmental needs rather than on continual family crises,” he said.
The study was supported by grants from the Ohio State University Initiative in Population Research and a population research center grant awarded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
from - http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080507132910.htm
A new study found that children who lived in unstable family situations after their parents divorced fared much worse as adults on a variety of measures compared to children who had stable post-divorce family situations.
“For many children with divorced parents, particularly young ones, the divorce does not mark the end of family structure changes – it marks the beginning,” said Yongmin Sun, co-author of the study and associate professor of sociology at Ohio State University’s Mansfield campus.
“A stable family situation after divorce does not erase the negative effects of a divorce, but children in this situation fare much better than do those who experience chronic instability”
The study appears in a recent issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family. Sun conducted the study with Yuanzhang Li of the Allied Technology Group.
Data for this study came from the National Education Longitudinal Study, which surveyed thousands of students across the country beginning in 8th grade in 1988, when they were about 14 years old. They were surveyed again in 1990, 1992 and then again in 2000 when they were about 26 years old.
The study compared children who grew up in three different situations:
- Children who grew up in always-married households (5,303 children).
- Children whose parents divorced before the study began, but who lived in a stable family structure between ages 14 and 18(954 children).
- Children whose parents divorced prior to the beginning of the study, and whose family situation changed once or twice between ages 14 and 18(697 children).
The researchers compared how children in these groups fared on measures of education, income and poverty in 2000 when they were 26.
Results showed that young adults who grew up in stable post-divorce families had similar chances of attending college and living in poverty compared to those from always married families. But they fared less well on measures of the highest degree obtained, occupational prestige and income.
However, the young adults who lived in unstable family situations after their parents divorced did worse on all measures. In fact, they fared more than twice as poorly on most measures compared to their peers who had stable family situations.
For example, adults from stable post-divorce families earned about $1,800 a year less than similar adults from always-married families. But those adults whose family situations changed one or more times between ages 14 and 18 earned about $4,600 less.
Sun noted that some of the children in the unstable family group also underwent a custody change between ages 14 and 18. An analysis showed that they did not fare significantly differently from those who were in unstable families, but did not experience a custody change.
There were also no significant differences between how boys and girls responded to family stability after a divorce, Sun said.
Why do children of divorce fare less well than those who grew up with parents who stayed married?
This study found that for those in stable post-divorce families, the difference in adult well-being was mostly due to a shortage of economic and social resources. Compared to always-married parents, divorced parents had a lower level of income, didn’t talk to their children as much about school-related matters, had fewer interactions with other parents, and moved their children to new schools more often.
“As many previous divorce studies point out, divorce reduces social resources within families because children have fewer interactions with the non-custodial parent, and in many cases, don’t get the quantity and quality of parenting from the custodial parent,” Sun said.
“In addition, after a family disruption, parents may not invest as much time with teachers and other parents in the community, all of which lead to a lower level of child well-being.”
For children in unstable families, the decline in social and economic resources was only part of the reason for the shortfalls they experienced in adulthood.
“These children probably experience a lot of stress and disruption from sources that we didn’t measure in this study,” he said.
These findings provide a clear message about how parents who are divorcing can best help their children, Sun said.
“A stabilized post-divorce family environment is clearly helpful for children, particularly for adolescents, such as those we studied, because stability allows children to focus on their own developmental needs rather than on continual family crises,” he said.
The study was supported by grants from the Ohio State University Initiative in Population Research and a population research center grant awarded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
from - http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/05/080507132910.htm
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR)
Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR)
The Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) already has an impressive track record. In Japan, four ABWR units are in operation; another three units are under construction in Taiwan and Japan, and nine more units are planned in Japan. It is feasible that an ABWR plant could be built in the United States and be commercially operational by 2012
ABWR is a direct cycle BWR that reflects 50 years of continued evolution from GEH's initial BWR concept. It combines the best features of GEH's worldwide BWR fleet with advanced technology enhancements, such as digital controls, that improve performance and longevity. The ABWR design is already licensed in three countries: the United States, Japan and Taiwan
The ABWR was the first Generation III reactor to begin commercial operation anywhere in the world.
Primary benefits and features of the ABWR over previous BWR designs include:
Proven, Advanced Technology
The Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) already has an impressive track record. In Japan, four ABWR units are in operation; another three units are under construction in Taiwan and Japan, and nine more units are planned in Japan. It is feasible that an ABWR plant could be built in the United States and be commercially operational by 2012
ABWR is a direct cycle BWR that reflects 50 years of continued evolution from GEH's initial BWR concept. It combines the best features of GEH's worldwide BWR fleet with advanced technology enhancements, such as digital controls, that improve performance and longevity. The ABWR design is already licensed in three countries: the United States, Japan and Taiwan
The ABWR was the first Generation III reactor to begin commercial operation anywhere in the world.
Primary benefits and features of the ABWR over previous BWR designs include:
- Proven technology and performance
- Certified design in the United States, Japan, & Taiwan
- Improved safety and reliability
- Enhanced operability and maintainability
- Reduced capital and Operation and Maintenance Costs
- Proven shorter construction time ... approximately 39 months from first concrete to first fuel load
Monday, April 4, 2011
Did Neil Armstrong really go to the Moon or NASA had faked the Moon landings?
Did Neil Armstrong really go to the Moon or NASA had faked the Moon landings?
There are certain questions relating to the sphere of science that are raised again and again despite repeated explanations: Does abominable snowman-yeti really exist? What is the reason for the growth of hair and fingernails even after death? Is it true that man uses only 10% of his brain? What is the mystery of Bermuda Triangle in which airplanes and ships have vanished without a trace? Does a monster really infest Scotland’s Loch Ness? Is there life anywhere else in the universe? Is there any element of truth in the news about sightings of flying saucers? And finally, one evergreen question wroth adding to the list and which is refusing to rest for the last 35 years: Had Neil Armstrong and other astronauts of the spaceship Apollo really gone to the moon and landed on it, or NASA had constructed elaborate studio set of the moon landing to misguide the world?
It is a principle of psychology that if a matter of public knowledge is contradicted with apparently logical proof then many will start believing it. The first instigation that the Moon landing was a hoax came from an American author named Bill Kaysing in 1974, two years after the last Apollo mission. He wrote a book titled, ‘We never went to the Moon…’ containing some sensational arguments which succeeded in confusing the readers. His extensive arguments appeared convincingly logical to the ordinary readers so this book became a best-seller. The book sowed the seeds of doubt about NASA’s claims regarding the Moon landings in the minds of many. People got an exciting and spicy topic of conversation. If the Moon missions of staggering 30 billion dollars were really a figment of imagination then it was a mind-boggling scam indeed.
Even this confounding revelation would have eventually taken a back seat and people would have ultimately forgotten it as a baseless canard. But in 1978 a film titled ‘Capricorn One’ was released. It was about a fictitious journey to the planet Mars and the spaceship in the film resembled Apollo spaceship. According to the plot of the film the astronauts had not gone to Mars at all but had staged a drama as if they had actually gone to the red planet. Popular imagination connected the subject matter of the film with the Moon landing missions. The film had been released at a very inopportune time. The credibility of the American government was at the lowest ebb due to misleading statements about the Vietnam War and Watergate scandal in the previous years. People had lost faith in the official announcements. In the prevailing atmosphere of doubt no wonder the needle of suspicion pointed towards the moon landings also.
Despite passage of time suspicion did not lie down. Years later an opinion poll in 1999 revealed that 6% of the persons polled believed that the Moon landings were nothing but conspiracy and hoax perpetrated by NASA. In terms of percentage the figure may appear small but in terms of absolute numbers this group formed a sample representing the opinion of 15 million American. Further 20% persons polled though did not reject the moon landing outright were not ready to accept them as a fact, i.e. they were uncertain. In this atmosphere of persistent disbelief Fox TV network’s program titled, ‘Conspiracy theory: Did we land on the moon?’ telecast in 2001 contributed only in making many people of the generation born after the great technological achievement skeptical about it.
The present day position is not much different. Though the section of population which believes that Apollo project was a hoax is a minority, it is quite substantial in numbers. They have reasons for upholding their beliefs which they present as proofs. There are more than a dozen reasons but the main reasons are 10 in number and here they are
from - http://www.herebeanswers.com/2010/10/neil-armstrong-moon-landing-nasa-fake.html
There are certain questions relating to the sphere of science that are raised again and again despite repeated explanations: Does abominable snowman-yeti really exist? What is the reason for the growth of hair and fingernails even after death? Is it true that man uses only 10% of his brain? What is the mystery of Bermuda Triangle in which airplanes and ships have vanished without a trace? Does a monster really infest Scotland’s Loch Ness? Is there life anywhere else in the universe? Is there any element of truth in the news about sightings of flying saucers? And finally, one evergreen question wroth adding to the list and which is refusing to rest for the last 35 years: Had Neil Armstrong and other astronauts of the spaceship Apollo really gone to the moon and landed on it, or NASA had constructed elaborate studio set of the moon landing to misguide the world?
It is a principle of psychology that if a matter of public knowledge is contradicted with apparently logical proof then many will start believing it. The first instigation that the Moon landing was a hoax came from an American author named Bill Kaysing in 1974, two years after the last Apollo mission. He wrote a book titled, ‘We never went to the Moon…’ containing some sensational arguments which succeeded in confusing the readers. His extensive arguments appeared convincingly logical to the ordinary readers so this book became a best-seller. The book sowed the seeds of doubt about NASA’s claims regarding the Moon landings in the minds of many. People got an exciting and spicy topic of conversation. If the Moon missions of staggering 30 billion dollars were really a figment of imagination then it was a mind-boggling scam indeed.
Even this confounding revelation would have eventually taken a back seat and people would have ultimately forgotten it as a baseless canard. But in 1978 a film titled ‘Capricorn One’ was released. It was about a fictitious journey to the planet Mars and the spaceship in the film resembled Apollo spaceship. According to the plot of the film the astronauts had not gone to Mars at all but had staged a drama as if they had actually gone to the red planet. Popular imagination connected the subject matter of the film with the Moon landing missions. The film had been released at a very inopportune time. The credibility of the American government was at the lowest ebb due to misleading statements about the Vietnam War and Watergate scandal in the previous years. People had lost faith in the official announcements. In the prevailing atmosphere of doubt no wonder the needle of suspicion pointed towards the moon landings also.
Despite passage of time suspicion did not lie down. Years later an opinion poll in 1999 revealed that 6% of the persons polled believed that the Moon landings were nothing but conspiracy and hoax perpetrated by NASA. In terms of percentage the figure may appear small but in terms of absolute numbers this group formed a sample representing the opinion of 15 million American. Further 20% persons polled though did not reject the moon landing outright were not ready to accept them as a fact, i.e. they were uncertain. In this atmosphere of persistent disbelief Fox TV network’s program titled, ‘Conspiracy theory: Did we land on the moon?’ telecast in 2001 contributed only in making many people of the generation born after the great technological achievement skeptical about it.
The present day position is not much different. Though the section of population which believes that Apollo project was a hoax is a minority, it is quite substantial in numbers. They have reasons for upholding their beliefs which they present as proofs. There are more than a dozen reasons but the main reasons are 10 in number and here they are
from - http://www.herebeanswers.com/2010/10/neil-armstrong-moon-landing-nasa-fake.html
Friday, April 1, 2011
investment in Vietnam
The U.S. Consulate General in Ho Chi Minh City and Binh Duong Province jointly sponsored a conference on September 22, 2009 to collectively better publicize opportunities for U.S. business in Binh Duong Province, Vietnam. Binh Duong, which neighbors Ho Chi Minh City and is one of the fastest growing locations in Southeast Asia, is increasing efforts to attract U.S. and European business according to Chairman of Binh Duong’s People’s Committee, Mr. Nguyen Hoang Son
Chairman Son said at the Conference in his opening remarks that the province would continue to improve its business environment and infrastructure to attract more investment, especially in green and hi-tech projects from foreign investors. The Chairman further noted that he and a large delegation from Binh Duong had just returned within the last few days from a business promotion trip to many countries in Europe. He said that interest in Europe was high in Binh Duong as a site for new factories and for participation in the Binh Duong new city (for more information on the new city, click here ) and other major infrastructure projects.
Chairman Son said at the trade and investment conference that the southern province would not license polluting projects and those outside industrial parks to ensure better control over environmental issues. He noted that the province would focus on large projects that need well-trained employees rather than those that need a large number of unskilled workers. The province had invested heavily in new modern industrial parks to attract new projects and currently hosted 28 industrial parks. He further noted that the province had invested in a new University and aimed to have 60 per cent of its workforce trained by 2010. It was also working with HCM City and neighboring provinces to develop and improve its transportation infrastructure system as well as seaports and international airports, he said.
Chairman Son was followed by the highest ranking official in the South of Vietnam, Kenneth J Fairfax, US Consul General in Ho Chi Minh City, who said Binh Duong has been successful in creating a new economic model for Viet Nam. Mr. Fairfax said that he was a big fan of Binh Duong because of the demonstrated vision, energy and leadership shown by the province.
from - http://www.business-in-asia.com/vietnam/trade_investment_binh_duong.html
investment in Vietnam
investment in Vietnam
Conference on Trade and Investment in Binh Duong Province, Vietnam
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)